[Early transfer from intensive care does not influence clinical results of carotid endarterectomy]

Chirurg. 2005 Oct;76(10):977-81. doi: 10.1007/s00104-005-1040-z.
[Article in German]

Abstract

The purpose of this prospective observational study was to examine the necessity of intensive care after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). In consideration of the neurological stage and comorbidities, morbidity and mortality after early transfer from the intensive care unit (ICU) were examined. The CEA patients were assigned preoperatively to short or long monitoring. Those with symptomatic stenosis ranking > or =2 (stroke within 6 weeks before surgery) and ischemic areas in cCT were observed overnight (long) in the ICU. Within 5.5 months, 100 consecutive patients had received 107 CEAs. Preoperatively, seven of these (6.54%) were assigned to ICU overnight monitoring. 14 patients (13%) needed postoperative over night ICU. We observed no perioperative stroke or mortality in the 107 consecutive CEAs. We could not detect any risk factor in preoperatively determining the length of postoperative ICU monitoring. This prospective, single center study showed that, after CEA, it is safe to monitor patients for only a short period (4-8 h) in the ICU. Morbidity and mortality after early transfer to the regular ward did not increase.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Coronary Care Units*
  • Endarterectomy, Carotid*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Monitoring, Physiologic
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Prospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Time Factors