Comment on "anomalously hindered E2 strength B(E2;2+1 --> 0+) in 16C"

Phys Rev Lett. 2005 May 20;94(19):199201; author reply 199202. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.199201. Epub 2005 May 16.
No abstract available

Publication types

  • Comment
  • Letter