While significant improvements have been made in the management of localized soft tissue sarcomas, enabling the realization of better functional results and a better overall outcome, progress in metastatic disease has been less than impressive. Adriamycin and DTIC based chemotherapy programs have resulted in response rates of upto 50%, with a small but finite cure fraction, especially in conjunction with surgical resection of residual abnormalities. The decade of the 80s experienced a considerable amount of enthusiasm in exploring the role of ifosfamide and mesna, and identified its definite usefulness as an effective salvage regimen with response rates of approximately 25%-30% in adriamycin failures. Studies evaluating the role of ifosfamide as up-front line agent in combination with adriamycin have met with increased toxicities without a significant additive therapeutic benefit, probably as a result of compromised dose intensity of each individual agent. The steep linear log-dose response relationship of alkylating agents and adriamycin constitutes the theoretical rationale for use of higher doses of chemotherapy, which have become feasible, with the advent of growth factors for bone marrow support. While this approach seems promising in its infancy, with improved complete and overall response, its ultimate effect on survival is anxiously awaited. The limited experience available in the literature with even more aggressive approaches like marrow ablative doses of chemotherapy followed by bone marrow transplantation, have been uniformly disappointing, with extremely short lived responses and extremely high morbidity and cost. As clinical research continues to improve our understanding and ability to implement the currently available therapeutic armamentarium, the search for newer and better drugs needs to continue.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)