Is there any difference in the condylar position and angulation after asymmetric mandibular setback?

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Feb;101(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.04.007. Epub 2005 Sep 21.

Abstract

Objective: This study was performed to compare the condylar position and angulation on 3-dimensional (3D) views between greater setback side (GSS) and lesser setback side (LSS) after asymmetric mandibular setback (AMS) using computed tomography.

Study design: The sample consisted of 12 Korean skeletal class III malocclusion patients with mandibular prognathism and facial asymmetry, who underwent sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) with rigid fixation. Tomographs were taken 1 month before (T1) and 6 months after surgery (T2). Position and angulation of the condyles were measured.

Results: At T1 stage, the condylar head in GSS showed more forward inclination on the sagittal view (P < .05) than that of LSS. Although there were significant inward and backward rotations of the condylar head in GSS (P < .01) and significant backward rotation in LSS at T2 stage (P < .05), 3D positions of the condyle in GSS and LSS were not changed after AMS.

Conclusion: SSRO might be effective to stabilize the condylar position for AMS.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Cephalometry
  • Facial Asymmetry / diagnostic imaging
  • Facial Asymmetry / surgery*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional
  • Male
  • Malocclusion, Angle Class III / surgery*
  • Mandible / surgery*
  • Mandibular Condyle / diagnostic imaging
  • Mandibular Condyle / pathology*
  • Oral Surgical Procedures
  • Osteotomy
  • Prognathism / surgery*
  • Radiography, Dental
  • Secondary Prevention
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Torque