Comprehensive examination of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer: a solution without a problem?

Int J Surg Pathol. 2006 Jan;14(1):1-8. doi: 10.1177/106689690601400101.

Abstract

Although several methods have been devised to examine sentinel lymph node (SLN) specimens in breast cancer, the extent of examination and whether it should routinely include multilevel sectioning to detect micrometastases (MM) (<2.0 mm) is still debated. In this study all "positive'' SLN biopsies from 67 consecutive patients with breast carcinoma and evaluated by means of an extended protocol were reviewed. Abnormal findings included micrometastases (MM) between 0.2 and 1.0 mm (14 cases), (MM) between 1.0 and 2.0 mm (8 cases), metastases>2.0 mm (22 cases), and isolated tumor cells (ITCs) (23 cases). The likelihood of finding metastatic deposits was comparable if sections were carried out at 100-, 150-, 200-, 250-, and 500-microm intervals. No metastatic foci>2.0 mm would have been missed. 1 MM (1.1 mm focus) was missed within the 250- and 500-microm levels on hematoxylin-eosin, but not complementary cytokeratin staining. Our data show that SLN step sectioning does not add significant yield if compared to standard examination carried on initial levels, if the minimal target of 1.0 mm micrometastatic deposit is sought.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Anatomy, Cross-Sectional / methods
  • Breast Neoplasms / chemistry
  • Breast Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Immunohistochemistry
  • Keratins / analysis
  • Lymph Nodes / chemistry
  • Lymph Nodes / pathology*
  • Microtomy / methods
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Metastasis / diagnosis*
  • Neoplasm Metastasis / pathology
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy / economics
  • Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy / methods*

Substances

  • Keratins