A randomised study of intravenous bolus versus continuous infusion of ifosfamide and doxorubicin with oral etoposide for small-cell lung cancer

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1991:117 Suppl 4:S139-40. doi: 10.1007/BF01613219.

Abstract

159 "poor risk" patients with previously untreated small cell lung cancer were entered into a randomised study of intravenous bolus versus continuous infusion chemotherapy with doxorubicin on weeks 1, 3, 5 and ifosfamide with mesna on weeks 2, 4, 6. Oral etoposide was given on days 1-5, 15-19, and 29-33. There was no difference in response rate or survival. However, patients treated with continuous infusion therapy had significantly less haematological toxicity (P = 0.0007), and less nausea and vomiting (P = 0.03).

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Oral
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use*
  • Carcinoma, Small Cell / drug therapy*
  • Doxorubicin / administration & dosage
  • Etoposide / administration & dosage
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Ifosfamide / administration & dosage*
  • Infusions, Intravenous / methods
  • Lung Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Survival Analysis

Substances

  • Etoposide
  • Doxorubicin
  • Ifosfamide