A report by the U.S. Government Office of Management and Budget (OMB) criticized the way health, safety, and environmental regulation of potential cancer causing substances is conducted by federal agencies, especially the Environmental Protection Agency. Cancer risk assessment--this report indicates--is governed by arbitrary policy assumptions and procedures improperly disguised as scientific and is designed to overestimate risk. Unwarranted economic burdens of ensuing regulation may then adversely affect standards of living and ultimately the very health and longevity that regulation is presumed to safeguard. An interdisciplinary workshop generally agreed with the OMB position and sharpened criticism of the procedures and scientific pretensions in the regulation of potential carcinogens. Various options for change were discussed, although it was felt that the success of detailed remedies would require a wider political, administrative, and scientific discourse.