Cardiac cine MR-imaging at 3T: FLASH vs SSFP

J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2006;8(5):709-15. doi: 10.1080/10976640600723797.

Abstract

The implications of an increase in field strength, from 1.5 T to 3 T, for routine functional cardiac examinations have been systematically investigated. Flip angle optimization was carried out for identical SSFP and FLASH cine imaging sequences at 1.5 T and 3 T, which supported the use of 20 degrees (FLASH 1.5 T and 3 T) and >60 degrees (SSFP 1.5 T and 3 T). The optimized sequences were applied in a study of cardiac function in a group of ten normal volunteers. Both SSFP and FLASH sequences showed significant SNR increases in the myocardium and blood at 3 T compared with 1.5 T, increases of 48% and 30% (myocardium and blood, respectively) for the SSFP sequence and 19% and 13% for the FLASH sequence. The SSFP sequence also showed a significant increase in CNR (22%). Image quality assessment revealed that the SSFP acquisitions were superior to FLASH at both field strengths. Although SSFP contained more artifacts at 3 T, they would not prevent its clinical use. We conclude that cardiac functional examinations at 3 T should use SSFP sequences.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Artifacts
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Coronary Circulation
  • Electrocardiography
  • Heart / anatomy & histology*
  • Heart / physiology
  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine / classification
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine / methods*
  • Models, Cardiovascular
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted