The epidemiology of infectious foodborne diseases has changed. Outbreaks more frequently occur geographically dispersed or protractedly over longer periods of time, and they often appear as a scatter of seemingly sporadic cases. This hampers and delays the identification of their epidemiological link. The surveillance of infectious foodborne diseases has to be refined accordingly to be able to detect these diffuse outbreaks. The German Protection against Infection Act, enacted in 2001, offers the potential of increased sensitivity due to timely electronic reporting of individual cases and detailed data accompanying each report. In addition to a timely and comprehensive reporting system, subtyping of pathogens has become an invaluable tool in identifying epidemiologically linked cases, i.e. outbreaks. Still, the sensitivity of foodborne disease surveillance still hinges on the willingness of physicians to order stool testing for enteric pathogens (and to report suspected outbreaks to local health departments). Without the active participation of physicians, the chance of detecting outbreaks and successfully investigating them is markedly reduced. Consequently, the general preventive strategy would be jeopardised, namely to understand the (often new) mechanisms by which contamination and disease transmission occur well enough to interrupt them.