Patient, implant, and alignment factors associated with revision of medial compartment unicondylar arthroplasty

J Arthroplasty. 2006 Sep;21(6 Suppl 2):108-15. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.012.

Abstract

The investigators reviewed 245 fixed-bearing unicondylar arthroplasties that one surgeon performed as treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis between 1988 and 1997 using a variety of cemented metal-backed tibial components and gamma-irradiated-in-air polyethylene bearings. Multivariate statistical analysis was used to evaluate how the event of revision was influenced by 3 patient factors, 3 implant factors, and 7 factors assessed from preoperative and early postoperative radiographs. Five factors were statistically associated with revision: (younger) patient age, (thinner) tibial component initial thickness, (longer) polyethylene shelf age, (lesser) angular reduction of medial tibial plateau varus, and (more varus) postoperative hip-knee-ankle angle. Besides illustrating deleterious consequences of using gamma-irradiated-in-air polyethylene in medial unicompartmental arthroplasty, our results support reducing varus angulation of the medial tibial plateau and knee at surgery.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / adverse effects*
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / methods
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Knee Joint / diagnostic imaging
  • Knee Prosthesis / adverse effects*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Osteoarthritis / surgery*
  • Polyethylene / adverse effects*
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Prosthesis Failure*
  • Radiography
  • Reoperation / statistics & numerical data
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors
  • Tibia / anatomy & histology
  • Tibia / surgery

Substances

  • Polyethylene