Blowing the whistle on healthcare fraud: should I?

J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2006 Nov;18(11):512-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2006.00175.x.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this article is to explore some of the factors involved when a nurse practitioner (NP) is confronted with a healthcare fraud situation. Ethical concepts and decision-making strategies are provided, as well as practical legal considerations.

Data sources: Government Internet Web sites; healthcare management, ethics, and nursing journals.

Conclusions: There are many forms of healthcare fraud. Healthcare fraud saps financial resources from the healthcare system and from individuals. The decision to blow the whistle on a colleague or organization is not an easy one and has potential for great discomfort. There are ethical decision-making strategies and practical considerations for the process of whistle-blowing should it become necessary.

Implications for practice: NPs may be confronted daily with billing and reimbursement issues. Being prepared to recognize healthcare fraud and knowing the ramifications of whistle-blowing are important tools to have in one's practice repertoire.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Attitude of Health Personnel*
  • Codes of Ethics
  • Decision Making* / ethics
  • Fraud / ethics
  • Fraud / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Fraud / psychology*
  • Humans
  • Models, Nursing
  • Nurse Practitioners / ethics
  • Nurse Practitioners / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Nurse Practitioners / psychology*
  • Nurse's Role / psychology
  • Principle-Based Ethics
  • Professional Competence / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Professional Competence / standards
  • Reimbursement Mechanisms / ethics
  • Reimbursement Mechanisms / legislation & jurisprudence
  • United States
  • Whistleblowing / ethics
  • Whistleblowing / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Whistleblowing / psychology*