Direct comparison of Au(3)(+) and C(60)(+) cluster projectiles in SIMS molecular depth profiling

J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2007 Mar;18(3):406-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2006.10.017. Epub 2006 Nov 21.

Abstract

The sputtering properties of two representative cluster ion beams in secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS), C(60)(+) and Au(3)(+), have been directly compared. Organic thin films consisting of trehalose and dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) are employed as prototypical targets. The strategy is to make direct comparison of the response of a molecular solid to each type of the bombarding cluster by overlapping the two ion beams onto the same area of the sample surface. The ion beams alternately erode the sample while keeping the same projectile for spectral acquisition. The results from these experiments are important to further optimize the use of cluster projectiles for SIMS molecular depth profiling experiments. For example, Au(3)(+) bombardment is found to induce more chemical damage as well as Au implantation when compared with C(60)(+). Moreover, C(60)(+) is found to be able to remove the damage and the implanted Au effectively. Discussions are also presented on strategies of enhancing sensitivity for imaging applications with cluster SIMS.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • 1,2-Dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine / analysis
  • 1,2-Dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine / chemistry
  • Fullerenes / chemistry*
  • Gold / chemistry*
  • Spectrometry, Mass, Secondary Ion*
  • Trehalose / analysis
  • Trehalose / chemistry

Substances

  • Fullerenes
  • 1,2-Dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine
  • Gold
  • Trehalose
  • fullerene C60