Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate initial endoscopic practices at diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in comparison with current recommendations. We wanted to develop a standard model for the endoscopy report which could be used in routine practice.
Patients and methods: From January 2000 to December 2002, 122 patients were hospitalized for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The initial endoscopic reports were reviewed retrospectively and compared with a model report established on the basis of current recommendations.
Results: One hundred and nineteen reports were re-examined. The principal reason for performing the endoscopic examination was dysphagia in 73.9% of patients. Tumor measurements (height, upper and lower extremities) were recorded in 51.2%, 79% and 41% of reports, respectively. 14.4% of the analyzed reports concerned endoscopic procedures which were performed after a first endoscopic examination because the initial report provided an imprecise tumor description. Tissue samples taken during the initial endoscopy allowed a pathological diagnosis in 94.2% of patients. Lugol staining was performed in 2.5% of procedures.
Conclusion: Insufficiently rigorous reporting compromises the reliability of initial upper digestive endoscopic procedures. Application of a standardized model for routine practice would favor more complete reports, starting with the first procedure.