Precision, signal-to-noise ratio, and dose optimization of magnitude and phase arterial input functions in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Mar;25(3):598-611. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20859.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine optimal conditions for precise measurement of arterial input function (AIFs) in dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion MRI.

Materials and methods: Magnitude-based (DeltaR(2)*) and phase-based (Deltaphi) AIFs were numerically simulated for several doses and baseline MRI noise levels [SNR(I(0))]. Random noise (1000 realizations) was added to real/imaginary MRI signals (derived from an internal carotid AIF), and AIF signal, noise, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were determined. The optimal dose was defined as the dose that maximizes mean AIF SNR over the first-pass (SNR(mean)), rather than SNR at the AIF peak (SNR(peak)) because, compared to SNR(peak), doses predicted by SNR(mean) reduced the AIF-induced variability in cerebral blood flow (CBF) by 24% to 40%.

Results: The AIF SNR is most influenced by choice of AIF signal, then optimal dosing, each with little penalty. Compared to DeltaR(2)*, Deltaphi signal has 4 to 80 times the SNR over all doses and time points, and approximately 10-fold SNR(mean) at respective optimal doses. Optimal doses induce 85% to 90% signal drop for the DeltaR(2)* method, and 70% to 75% for Deltaphi, with two-fold dose errors causing approximately 1.7-fold loss in SNR(mean). Increases in SNR(I(0)) proportionally increase AIF SNR, but at a cost.

Conclusion: AIF SNR is affected most by signal type, then dosing, and lastly, SNR(I(0)).

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Carotid Artery, Internal / anatomy & histology*
  • Carotid Artery, Internal / pathology
  • Cerebrovascular Circulation / physiology
  • Computer Simulation
  • Contrast Media / administration & dosage*
  • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
  • Humans
  • Image Enhancement / methods*
  • Magnetic Resonance Angiography / methods*
  • Male
  • Models, Biological
  • Organometallic Compounds*
  • Reference Values
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted*
  • Time Factors

Substances

  • Contrast Media
  • Organometallic Compounds
  • gadoversetamide