The health trade-off of rural residence for impaired older adults: longer life, more impairment

J Rural Health. 2007 Spring;23(2):124-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2007.00079.x.

Abstract

Context: Years lived with and without physical impairment are central measures of public health.

Purpose: We sought to determine whether these measures differed between rural and urban residents who were impaired at the time of a baseline measurement. We examined 16 subgroups defined by rural/urban residence, gender, race, and education.

Methods: This is a 20-year retrospective cohort study, following 2,939 Americans who were aged 65-69 in 1982 and physically impaired at the time of the baseline measurement, with data from the National Long-Term Care Survey. Interpolated Markov chain analysis and microsimulation estimated life expectancy at age 65 and expected number of years with physical impairment. Impairment was defined as requiring help in 1 or more activities of daily living.

Findings: Among older individuals with physical impairments at baseline, rural residents lived notably longer than urban residents. In all but 1 group, rural residents lived more years with physical impairment, and they also had a notably larger proportion of remaining life impaired.

Conclusions: Results suggest a notable public health impact of rural residence for impaired individuals, a longer expected period of impairment. Needs for services for people with impairments may be greater in rural areas.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Activities of Daily Living
  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Disabled Persons / statistics & numerical data*
  • Female
  • Health Surveys
  • Humans
  • Life Expectancy*
  • Longevity*
  • Male
  • Markov Chains
  • Residence Characteristics / classification*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Rural Health / statistics & numerical data*
  • Time Factors
  • United States
  • Urban Health / statistics & numerical data*