Histologic evaluation of human bone integration on machined and sandblasted acid-etched titanium surfaces in type IV bone

J Oral Implantol. 2007;33(1):8-12. doi: 10.1563/0-791.1.

Abstract

The aim of this preliminary study was to evaluate the influence of a sandblasted acid-etched surface on bone-implant contact percentage (BIC%) as well as the bone density in the threads area (BD%) in type 4 bone after 2 months of unloaded healing. Five subjects (mean age = 42.6 years) received 2 microimplants each during conventional implant surgery in the posterior maxilla. The microimplants with commercially pure titanium surface (machined) and sandblasted acid-etched surface served as the control and test surfaces, respectively. After a healing period of 2 months, the microimplants and the surrounding tissue were removed and prepared for ground sectioning and histomorphometric analysis. One microimplant with a machined surface was found to be clinically unstable at the time of retrieval. Histometric evaluation indicated mean BIC% was 20.66+/-14.54% and 40.08+/- 9.89% for machined and sandblasted acid-etched surfaces, respectively (P=.03). The BD% was 26.33 +/-19.92% for machined surface and 54.84+/-22.77% for sandblasted acid-etched surface (P=.015). Within the limits of this study, the data suggest that the sandblasted acid-etched implant surface presented a higher percentage of bone-implant contact compared with machined surfaces, under unloaded conditions in posterior maxilla after a healing period of 2 months.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Acid Etching, Dental
  • Adult
  • Bone Density
  • Dental Implantation, Endosseous
  • Dental Implants*
  • Dental Polishing
  • Dental Prosthesis Design*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Maxilla
  • Middle Aged
  • Miniaturization
  • Molar
  • Osseointegration*
  • Surface Properties
  • Titanium

Substances

  • Dental Implants
  • Titanium