Remifentanil compared with midazolam and pethidine sedation during colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized study

Dig Dis Sci. 2008 Jan;53(1):34-40. doi: 10.1007/s10620-007-9818-0. Epub 2007 May 3.

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of our study was to compare the safety and efficacy of remifentanil during colonoscopy with those of the standard combination of midazolam and pethidine.

Methods: One-hundred and sixteen consecutive patients scheduled for colonoscopy were randomly assigned to groups A or B. Patients in group A (n = 56) received intravenous (IV) midazolam and pethidine. Patients in group B (n = 60) received IV remifentanil.

Results: Recovery was faster in group B (0 min) than in group A (56 +/- 11.3 min) (P < 0.001). There was a marked difference between groups B and A with regard to the time of hospital discharge-28.7 +/- 4.3 and 148.9 +/- 34 min, respectively (P < 0.001). Patients in group A rated the procedure as comfortable, as also did those in group B. A combination of midazolam and pethidine had a greater affect on patients' cardiorespiratory characteristics.

Conclusion: Remifentanil during colonoscopy provides sufficient pain relief with better hemodynamic stability, less respiratory depression, and significantly faster recovery and hospital discharge than moderate sedation with midazolam and pethidine.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Anesthetics, Intravenous / therapeutic use*
  • Colonic Diseases / diagnosis*
  • Colonoscopy / methods*
  • Conscious Sedation / methods*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Midazolam / therapeutic use*
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Piperidines / therapeutic use*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Remifentanil
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Anesthetics, Intravenous
  • Piperidines
  • Remifentanil
  • Midazolam