Elderly patients are referred with increasing frequency for aortic valve replacement (AVR), due to the ageing of the population and to improved results of surgery. We retrospectively analysed the in-hospital and short-term (up to three years) results of AVR in 185 patients aged >or=75 years, operated on at our institution from January 2000 to December 2003. Follow-up was completed by a telephone interview during January 2005. Hospital mortality was 6.5% (12 patients). A non-elective operation (P=0.001), preoperative NYHA functional class >or=III (P=0.06), and chronic renal failure (P=0.02) were associated with increased operative mortality. Of note, age >or=80 years did not increase the surgical risk. The 4-year actuarial survival was 70.5%, the event-free survival was 60.6%, and almost all of the interviewed patients thought that they had benefited from the operation. Preoperative intubation, a NYHA class >or=III, and a non-elective operation were univariate predictors of a poorer outcome. Our data show that aortic valve replacement may be performed with low morbidity and mortality in the elderly patient (age >or=75 years), and that an age >or=80 years neither increases the surgical risk, nor significantly worsens the short-term outcome.