The development of cued versus contextual conditioning in a predictable and an unpredictable human fear conditioning preparation

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Mar;127(3):593-600. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.08.001. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

Abstract

In this human fear conditioning study, the online development of conditioned US-expectancy to discrete cues and background contexts was measured in two groups. In the paired group (n=30), the CS was systematically followed by an aversive shock (US). In the unpaired group (n=30), CS and US were presented explicitly unpaired. Using US-expectancy ratings, we replicated the basic finding already illustrated in humans with startle modulation. In the paired group, the CS elicited more US-expectancy than the context, whereas in the unpaired group, the context elicited more US-expectancy than the CS. Interestingly, we also observed a trial-by-trial development of conditioning to the context in the unpaired group as indicated by a significant linear trend. This gradual development and the evidence for the role of US-expectancy in contextual fear add to the idea that cued and contextual fear rely on the same basic associative processes.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Association
  • Conditioning, Classical / physiology*
  • Cues*
  • Electromyography
  • Electroshock / methods
  • Electroshock / psychology
  • Electroshock / statistics & numerical data
  • Fear / physiology
  • Fear / psychology*
  • Female
  • Habituation, Psychophysiologic / physiology
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Photic Stimulation / methods
  • Reflex, Startle / physiology
  • Students / psychology