Signal-to-noise ratio comparison of phased-array vs. implantable coil for rat spinal cord MRI

Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Oct;25(8):1215-21. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2007.01.006. Epub 2007 Feb 26.

Abstract

The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) performance and practicality issues of a four-element phased-array coil and an implantable coil system were compared for rat spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 7 T. MRI scans of the rat spinal cord at T10 were acquired from eight rats over a 3 week period using both coil systems, with and without laminectomy. The results demonstrate that both the phased array and the implantable coil systems are feasible options for rat spinal cord imaging at 7 T, with both systems providing adequate SNR for 100-mum spatial resolution at reasonable imaging times. The implantable coils provided significantly higher SNR, as compared to the phased array (average SNR gain of 5.3x between the laminectomy groups and 2.5x between the nonlaminectomy groups). The implantable coil system should be used if maximal SNR is critical, whereas the phased array is a good choice for its ease of use and lesser invasiveness.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Equipment Design
  • Equipment Failure Analysis
  • Image Enhancement / instrumentation*
  • Image Enhancement / methods
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / instrumentation*
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / veterinary*
  • Magnetics / instrumentation*
  • Prostheses and Implants*
  • Rats
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Spinal Cord / anatomy & histology*
  • Transducers*