Pain after minimally invasive videoassisted and after minimally invasive open thyroidectomy--results of a prospective outcome study

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008 May;393(3):271-3. doi: 10.1007/s00423-007-0229-7. Epub 2007 Oct 2.

Abstract

Background: Substantial modifications in surgical treatment of thyroid disease have changed the postoperative management of thyroidectomized patients. The reduction of postoperative pain permit a short-stay surgery.

Materials and methods: We have analyzed the patients treated in our Unit from July 2006 to December 2006, with minimally invasive cervicotomy and mini-invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy. We have registered the postoperative pain applying an evaluation protocol numeric scale. The results were analyzed by t test.

Results: One hundred thirteen patients were divided in two groups: group A, minimally invasive cervicotomy (15 male and 46 female patients); group B, mini-invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (9 male and 43 female patients). Upon returning to the ward, the pain scale group A vs B was 2.77 +/- 1.16 vs 2.5 +/- 0.762 (p = 0.22) .At 24 h after surgery, the pain scale in group A was 1.82 +/- 1.258 vs 1.031 +/- 0.8608 (p < 0.005).

Conclusions: Both methods are safe, but mini-invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy gives not only a better cosmetic result but a reduction of postoperative pain especially at 24 h.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adenocarcinoma, Follicular / surgery
  • Adenocarcinoma, Papillary / surgery
  • Adult
  • Esthetics
  • Female
  • Goiter / surgery
  • Humans
  • Length of Stay
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / methods*
  • Pain Measurement
  • Pain, Postoperative / etiology*
  • Pain, Postoperative / prevention & control
  • Prospective Studies
  • Surgical Instruments
  • Thyroid Neoplasms / surgery
  • Thyroidectomy / methods*
  • Thyrotoxicosis / surgery
  • Video-Assisted Surgery / methods*