The effects of explanatory style on concussion outcomes in sport

NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22(3):161-7.

Abstract

Individuals with an optimistic explanatory style have generally been linked with improved mental and physical health across a variety of chronic and serious conditions. The purpose of the current study was to examine the effects of explanatory style on recovery time and number of sport-related concussions suffered in the last 12 months. University varsity athletes (n=170) suffering from at least one concussion over the last 12 months from six contact or collision team sports completed both the Attributional Style Questionnaire and the Sport History Questionnaire. The results indicated that athletes with an optimistic explanatory style took longer to recover than athletes with a pessimistic or average explanatory style. More specifically, optimistic athletes who suffered a complex concussion (requiring more than 7 days to recover) took significantly longer to return to play. However, the results showed that explanatory style did not influence whether an athlete suffered subsequent concussions. Overall, the current results can be used to better understand the psychology of concussions, as well as concussion prevention efforts and management strategies.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Athletic Injuries / epidemiology
  • Athletic Injuries / physiopathology
  • Athletic Injuries / psychology*
  • Brain Concussion / epidemiology
  • Brain Concussion / physiopathology
  • Brain Concussion / psychology*
  • Cohort Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Internal-External Control*
  • Male
  • Personality Inventory
  • Personality*
  • Recovery of Function
  • Recurrence
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Time Factors