Objective: We aimed to evaluate an effective dosage and safety profile of pimecrolimus as an anti-inflammatory drug for drug-eluting stents.
Methods: In the dose finding study, coronary arteries of 20 domestic swine were randomly implanted with bare metal stents (ProKinetic and Guidant Vision), the ProKinetic stent with polylactic acid (PLLA), and pimecrolimus-eluting stents (32, 75, and 120 microg) over a period of 4 weeks. In addition, pimecrolimus (75 microg) and ProKinetic stents were randomly implanted into six swine over 3 months. In the safety study, the ProKinetic stent, the ProKinetic stent with PLLA, mid- (45 microg) and high-dose pimecrolimus (120 microg), and overlapping mid-dose stents were implanted over a period of 4 weeks. Mid-dose, ProKinetic stent, and ProKinetic stent with PLLA were implanted over a period of 3 months.
Results: The dose finding study revealed excellent luminal patency with low percent occlusion (approximately 29% vs. approximately 41%), injury (0.53-0.59 vs. 1.25), and inflammation (0.78-0.97 vs. 1.08) for the pimecrolimus group compared with the vision group. The safety study arm showed similar angiographic results for all tested groups, with a significantly larger minimal lumen diameter for pimecrolimus stents compared to PLLA stents. Except for the high-dose group and overlapping area of the overlapping group, promising morphometric results were found for pimecrolimus compared to bare metal stents.
Conclusions: Present data suggest that pimecrolimus-eluting stents are safe and have a similar healing profile to bare metal stents. They may suppress inflammation, leading to a reduced intimal response and a milder inflammatory reaction in a porcine model.