Induction vs. escalation of therapy for relapsing multiple sclerosis: the evidence

Neurol Sci. 2008 Sep:29 Suppl 2:S250-2. doi: 10.1007/s10072-008-0953-y.

Abstract

Not all patients presenting with their first attack of multiple sclerosis (MS) or early thereafter are necessarily in the same phase of disease; some truly present early with minimal disease, whereas others present late, having accumulated already considerable damage to the central nervous system (CNS). This beckons a different approach to therapy depending on "where" a patient may be in the course of disease. If early, then any of the current first line immunomodulating agents may be appropriate, whereas later disease calls for a more aggressive approach entailing either induction with a more powerful but riskier treatment or an escalation approach, moving through first line agents and stepping up to more aggressive treatments. This paper discusses the rationale for either regimen.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Disease Progression
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Humans
  • Immunologic Factors / administration & dosage*
  • Immunologic Factors / adverse effects
  • Immunosuppression Therapy / methods*
  • Immunosuppression Therapy / standards
  • Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting / drug therapy*
  • Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting / immunology
  • Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting / physiopathology
  • Risk Assessment
  • Secondary Prevention
  • Time Factors

Substances

  • Immunologic Factors