A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation

J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Sep;35(8 Suppl):216-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01272.x.

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of this systematic review were to assess the survival rate of grafts and implants placed with sinus floor elevation.

Material and methods: An electronic search was conducted to identify studies on sinus floor elevation, with a mean follow-up time of at least 1 year after functional loading.

Results: The search provided 839 titles. Full-text analysis was performed for 175 articles resulting in 48 studies that met the inclusion criteria, reporting on 12,020 implants. Meta-analysis indicated an estimated annual failure rate of 3.48% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.48%-4.88%] translating into a 3-year implant survival of 90.1% (95% CI: 86.4%-92.8%). However, when failure rates was analyzed on the subject level, the estimated annual failure was 6.04% (95% CI: 3.87%-9.43%) translating into 16.6% (95% CI: 10.9%-24.6%) of the subjects experiencing implant loss over 3 years.

Conclusion: The insertion of dental implants in combination with maxillary sinus floor elevation is a predictable treatment method showing high implant survival rates and low incidences of surgical complications. The best results (98.3% implant survival after 3 years) were obtained using rough surface implants with membrane coverage of the lateral window.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Alveolar Ridge Augmentation / methods*
  • Bone Substitutes / therapeutic use
  • Bone Transplantation
  • Dental Implants*
  • Dental Prosthesis Design
  • Dental Restoration Failure
  • Graft Survival
  • Humans
  • Maxilla / surgery*
  • Maxillary Sinus / surgery*
  • Membranes, Artificial
  • Survival Analysis

Substances

  • Bone Substitutes
  • Dental Implants
  • Membranes, Artificial