Being similar versus being equal: intergroup similarity moderates the influence of in-group norms on discrimination and prejudice

Br J Soc Psychol. 2009 Jun;48(Pt 2):253-73. doi: 10.1348/014466608X342943. Epub 2008 Sep 11.

Abstract

In two studies, we examined the influence of in-group norms of anti- and pro-discrimination on prejudice and discrimination as a function of intergroup similarity (Studies 1 and 2) and in-group identification (Study 2). In a condition where there was no information about intergroup similarity (Study 1) or intergroup similarity was low (Study 2), prejudice and discrimination were lower when norms prescribe anti-discrimination compared to pro-discrimination. In contrast, when intergroup similarity was high, prejudice and discrimination were higher when the in-group norm represents anti-discrimination compared to pro-discrimination. This pattern was most apparent among highly identified in-group members (Study 2). The paradoxical effect of the anti-discrimination norm in the high similarity condition is interpreted as a response to the threat this situation introduces to in-group distinctiveness.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Affect
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina / ethnology
  • Emigrants and Immigrants / statistics & numerical data
  • Female
  • Group Processes*
  • Humans
  • Identification, Psychological*
  • Male
  • Models, Psychological
  • Prejudice*
  • Self Concept
  • Social Identification*
  • Social Perception*
  • Stereotyping
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Switzerland / ethnology