A comparative study of electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC) versus SCX-IMAC-based methods for phosphopeptide isolation/enrichment

J Proteome Res. 2008 Nov;7(11):4869-77. doi: 10.1021/pr800473j. Epub 2008 Oct 2.

Abstract

Electrostatic repulsion-hydrophilic interaction chromatography (ERLIC) has been introduced recently for phosphopeptide enrichment. Here we compared ERLIC with the well-established SCX-IMAC for identifying phosphopeptides in EGF-treated A431 cells. The ERLIC approach detected a higher number of phosphopeptides (17 311) than SCX-IMAC (4850), but it only detected 926 unique phosphopeptides compared to 1315 in SCX-IMAC. Only 12% unique phosphopeptides were common to both approaches, suggesting that more comprehensive phosphoproteomes could be generated by complementing SCX-IMAC with ERLIC.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Carcinoma / metabolism
  • Carcinoma / pathology
  • Cell Line, Tumor
  • Chromatography* / instrumentation
  • Chromatography* / methods
  • Chromatography, Affinity* / instrumentation
  • Chromatography, Affinity* / methods
  • Epidermal Growth Factor / metabolism
  • Epidermal Growth Factor / pharmacology
  • Humans
  • Ion Exchange
  • Models, Biological
  • Phosphopeptides / analysis*
  • Phosphopeptides / chemistry
  • Phosphopeptides / isolation & purification*
  • Static Electricity
  • Substrate Specificity

Substances

  • Phosphopeptides
  • Epidermal Growth Factor