2006 GEP-ISFG collaborative exercise on mtDNA: reflections about interpretation, artefacts, and DNA mixtures

Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2008 Mar;2(2):126-33. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2007.10.010. Epub 2007 Nov 9.

Abstract

We report the results of the seventh edition of the GEP-ISFG mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) collaborative exercise. The samples submitted to the participant laboratories were blood stains from a maternity case and simulated forensic samples, including a case of mixture. The success rate for the blood stains was moderate ( approximately 77%); even though four inexperienced laboratories concentrated about one-third of the total errors. A similar success was obtained for the analysis of mixed samples (78.8% for a hair-saliva mixture and 69.2% for a saliva-saliva mixture). Two laboratories also dissected the haplotypes contributing to the saliva-saliva mixture. Most of the errors were due to reading problems and misinterpretation of electropherograms, demonstrating once more that the lack of a solid devised experimental approach is the main cause of error in mtDNA testing.

MeSH terms

  • Artifacts*
  • Blood Stains
  • Clinical Laboratory Techniques / standards*
  • Computer Simulation
  • DNA / analysis
  • DNA / genetics
  • DNA / isolation & purification*
  • DNA Fingerprinting / standards*
  • DNA, Mitochondrial / blood
  • DNA, Mitochondrial / chemistry
  • DNA, Mitochondrial / genetics*
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • Databases, Factual
  • Female
  • Forensic Medicine
  • Genetic Markers
  • Hair / chemistry
  • Haplotypes
  • Humans
  • Phylogeny
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • Polymorphism, Genetic
  • Pregnancy
  • Quality Control
  • Reference Standards
  • Saliva / chemistry

Substances

  • DNA, Mitochondrial
  • Genetic Markers
  • DNA