Aims: Identification of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) may depend on the tissue plane of tracer injection. To explore this, we developed a dual-isotope technique to compare the lymphatic drainage basins accessed by intradermal and parenchymal injections.
Methods: Fifteen breast cancer patients had simultaneous parenchymal and intradermal injections of (99m)Tc-labelled human immunoglobulin G (HIG) and (111)In-HIG, respectively, 2-4h before axillary lymph node clearance surgery. All 228 freshly dissected nodes were assayed by well counting and examined for metastatic disease by haematoxylin/eosin staining and immuno-histochemistry.
Results: Total nodal uptake following intradermal injection was 10 times more than after parenchymal injection. Tracer uptake within the first three draining nodes divided patients into three groups; four (group 1) had identical 1st, 2nd and 3rd echelon nodes, six (group 2) had identical 1st and 2nd echelon nodes and five (group 3) had different 1st echelon nodes. With respect to the first, second and third groups, there was close, moderate and poor correlation (Pearson), respectively, between individual nodal counts accumulated from the two injection sites. Of eight patients with nodal disease, the SLN identified by intradermal and parenchymal injections contained disease in seven and four patients, respectively.
Conclusions: Comparison of nodal tracer distributions from the two injection planes allows a functional model to be developed with two possible routes of drainage from the parenchymal plane, one joining the tract from the areolar plexus and the other passing independently to the axilla which builds upon Sappey's original anatomical model. This may explain the variable uptake, discordance and false negative SLN identification.