A comparative study of the St. Jude Medical and Björk-Shiley convexo-concave prostheses in isolated valve replacement

J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1991 Sep-Oct;32(5):557-63.

Abstract

This is a study of 199 consecutive patients who survived isolated mitral or aortic valve replacement with a Björk-Shiley (B-S) or St. Jude Medical (SJM) prostheses. Mean follow-up was 36 months. Preoperative status was similar for both groups (B-S or SMJ). Five year survival rates for mitral valve replacement (MVR) were 91% for B-S and SJM, and for aortic valve replacement (AVR) 96% vs 91% for SJM (p less than 0.06). Linearized incidence of thromboembolism in MVR was 5.62% patient year for BS and 5.23% patient year for SJM (p = NS). Classical risk factors for thromboembolism were evaluated on a univariate analysis: no single risk factor was identified. Only the association of two or more was possibly significant. The presence of inadequate anticoagulation (prothrombin index greater than 50%) was the main risk factor for thromboembolism, as the incidence rate was 19% per patient year when poorly anticoagulated versus 4.6% per patient year incidence in the whole series (p less than 0.01).

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Actuarial Analysis
  • Anticoagulants / therapeutic use
  • Aortic Valve
  • Heart Valve Diseases / mortality
  • Heart Valve Diseases / surgery*
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis / mortality*
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Middle Aged
  • Mitral Valve
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology*
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Risk Factors
  • Thromboembolism / epidemiology*

Substances

  • Anticoagulants