Radial forearm donor site: comparison of the functional and cosmetic outcomes of different reconstructive methods

J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Apr;38(2):294-301.

Abstract

Objective: To determine which method of fascial dissection and skin graft reconstruction of radial forearm free flap defects has superior functional and cosmetic outcomes.

Methods: Consenting patients undergoing major head and neck operative resection and reconstruction with a radial forearm free flap were prospectively enrolled and randomized into one of the following four groups: (1) suprafascial dissection with meshed graft reconstruction; (2) suprafascial dissection with sheet graft reconstruction; (3) subfascial dissection with meshed graft reconstruction; and (4) subfascial dissection with sheet graft reconstruction. Functional, cosmetic, and tendon exposure outcomes were collected prospectively with patients and outcome assessors blinded to treatment group assignment. Validated self-report questionnaires and objective functional measures were used.

Results: Sixty-two patients met the criteria for inclusion. Analysis revealed that suprafascial dissection with sheet graft reconstruction yielded superior functional, cosmetic, and tendon exposure outcomes.

Conclusion: Suprafascial dissection with sheet graft reconstruction should be offered to patients requiring radial forearm free flap reconstruction of major head and neck defects.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Fasciotomy
  • Female
  • Forearm
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures
  • Patient Satisfaction*
  • Plastic Surgery Procedures / methods*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Skin Transplantation / methods*
  • Surgical Flaps*
  • Surgical Mesh
  • Tissue and Organ Harvesting