Limits of detection of bluetongue virus with different assay systems

J Vet Diagn Invest. 1990 Apr;2(2):103-6. doi: 10.1177/104063879000200203.

Abstract

The sensitivity of different assay systems for detecting low concentrations of bluetongue virus (BTV) were compared. These assays included blind passage on baby hamster kidney (BHK-21) cells and on cattle pulmonary artery endothelial (CPAE) cells, immunoperoxidase staining of cells on multiwell slides, and cDNA/RNA hybridization of BTV infected cells. Nine serial 10-fold dilutions of a cell culture-adapted BTV serotype 11 were tested (each dilution was treated as a separate sample) in all assays. Visual inspection for cytopathic effects (CPE) during 3 passages in BHK-21 cells detected samples that contained greater than or equal to 3 plaque forming units (PFU)/ml of BTV. Evidence of CPE during 3 passages in CPAE cells detected samples that contained greater than or equal to 0.3 PFU/ml of BTV. A limit of detection (greater than or equal to 0.3 PFU/ml) was obtained faster by immunoperoxidase staining of BTV-inoculated CPAE cells on multiwell slides and incubated for 3 days. The cDNA/RNA hybridizations of CPAE and BHK-21 cells incubated for 2 or 3 days, respectively, with BTV dilution samples detected samples that contained greater than or equal to 30 PFU/ml. Of the assay systems examined, immunoperoxidase staining of CPAE cells on multiwell slides inoculated with cell culture-adapted BTV was the most sensitive and fastest assay for definitive virus identification.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Bluetongue virus / genetics
  • Bluetongue virus / isolation & purification*
  • Cell Line
  • Cytopathogenic Effect, Viral
  • DNA Probes
  • DNA, Viral / analysis
  • Immunoenzyme Techniques
  • Immunohistochemistry
  • Nucleic Acid Hybridization
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Serial Passage
  • Viral Plaque Assay

Substances

  • DNA Probes
  • DNA, Viral