[Vaginal pelvic repair. Always with mesh or not?]

Urologe A. 2009 Sep;48(9):1038-43. doi: 10.1007/s00120-009-2080-7.
[Article in German]

Abstract

Several surgical methods are possible when aiming at reconstruction of pelvic organ prolapse in women, and the experienced surgeon implements the knowledge gained from open, laparoscopic, and vaginal techniques. These feature different rates of success and relapse as well as different complication risks. Because of the accumulating morbidity of aging patients, there is a search for a safe minimally invasive technique. With the advent of synthetic meshes, surgeons have used them frequently and often uncritically for reconstruction of the female pelvic floor. In these cases the vaginal approach is preferred as opposed to alternative techniques, as it is less invasive and allows for better convalescence. Furthermore, this approach leads to low complication and relapse rates even when synthetic meshes are omitted.

Publication types

  • English Abstract
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Colpotomy / instrumentation*
  • Colpotomy / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Plastic Surgery Procedures / instrumentation*
  • Plastic Surgery Procedures / methods*
  • Surgical Mesh*
  • Uterine Prolapse / surgery*