It is an unresolved issue whether various thoracotomies affect clinical outcomes. In addition, a wide variety of technical approaches of video-assisted thoracic surgery depend on the facility. We reviewed 152 consecutive patients with clinical T1N0M0 lung cancer that underwent three types of lobectomy with systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy in a single institute: 46 conventional thoracotomies (OPEN), 50 anterolateral small thoracotomies mainly using the thoracoscope as a light guide (ASSIST), and 56 minimum thoracotomies in which only a thoracoscope view was used (PURE). Total discharge from the chest drainage tube, length of hospital stay, and post-thoracotomy pain were significantly less in PURE than in OPEN and ASSIST. The results of mediastinal lymphadenectomy were equivalent. The 3-year survival rates were also similar among the three groups. We conclude that good clinical outcomes, especially reduced post-thoracotomy pain, seemed to correlate with the lesser degree of destruction of the chest wall with the identical quality as an acceptable cancer operation in PURE.