Clinical and radiological outcomes of fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a meta-analysis

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Mar;18(3):325-40. doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-0909-7. Epub 2009 Sep 25.

Abstract

Controversy exists regarding the clinical and radiological differences in outcomes between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee replacements (TKR). The aim of this study was to compare these two TKR designs using a meta-analysis of the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and AMED in addition to a review of unpublished material. All included papers were critically appraised using a modified PEDro critical appraisal tool. Thirty-three studies were eligible, assessing the outcomes of 3532 TKRs. Analysis suggested that there was no significant difference in clinical or radiological outcomes and complication rates between fixed- and mobile-bearing TKRs.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / adverse effects*
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / instrumentation*
  • Equipment Failure Analysis*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Knee Joint / diagnostic imaging*
  • Male
  • Prosthesis Design*
  • Radiography
  • Range of Motion, Articular
  • Reoperation
  • Weight-Bearing