Manometric and functional comparison of ileal pouch anal anastomosis with and without anal manipulation

Am J Surg. 1991 Jan;161(1):90-5; discussion 95-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90366-l.

Abstract

We report the results of postoperative physiologic and functional evaluation of 153 patients with ileal pouch anal-anastomosis (IPAA). Ninety-nine patients had anal manipulation for either mucosal proctectomy, transanal placement pursestring suture with stapled IPAA, or handsewn IPAA (manipulation). Fifty-four patients had stapled IPAA with anal pursestrings placed transabdominally without mucosectomy (no manipulation). Patients with transabdominal anal pursestring placement and stapled IPAA without mucosectomy had a higher mean maximum anal resting pressure than patients who had endoanal manipulation. This correlates with improved continence and a reduced need to wear a pad. Avoidance of anal manipulation preserves anal canal resting tone and improves the functional result after IPAA.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Anal Canal / physiopathology
  • Anal Canal / surgery*
  • Anastomosis, Surgical / methods
  • Defecation*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Ileostomy
  • Ileum / surgery*
  • Male
  • Manometry*