Anatomic outcomes of abdominal sacrocolpopexy with or without paravaginal repair

Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Mar;21(3):279-83. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-1013-8.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: We sought to compare rates of recurrent cystocele following sacrocolpopexy with and without paravaginal repair (PVR).

Methods: This retrospective cohort study compared outcomes for patients undergoing sacrocolpopexy with (group A) and without (group B) concomitant PVR. Defining anterior failure as point Ba > or = -1 cm, we compared anatomic outcomes and reoperation rates for recurrence of cystocele.

Results: One hundred seventy patients undergoing sacrocolpopexy had anterior wall prolapse at or beyond the hymen before surgery (62 in group A and 108 in group B). Ten (16.1%) patients in group A and 29 (26.9%) in group B experienced anterior wall prolapse to or beyond -1 cm (p = 0.13, power 0.38). Among these groups, one (1.6%) and five (4.6%) underwent reoperation for cystocele recurrence (p=0.42, power <0.3).

Conclusions: Despite the trend toward improved clinical outcomes, we were unable to detect a statistically significant difference with inclusion of PVR with sacrocolpopexy.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Cohort Studies
  • Cystocele / surgery*
  • Female
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures*
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Recurrence
  • Reoperation
  • Retrospective Studies