Monte Carlo calculation of dose distribution in early stage NSCLC patients planned for accelerated hypofractionated radiation therapy in the NCIC-BR25 protocol

Phys Med Biol. 2010 Feb 7;55(3):723-33. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/3/012. Epub 2010 Jan 13.

Abstract

The dosimetric consequences of plans optimized using a commercial treatment planning system (TPS) for hypofractionated radiation therapy are evaluated by re-calculating with Monte Carlo (MC). Planning guidelines were in strict accordance with the Canadian BR25 protocol which is similar to the RTOG 0236 and 0618 protocols in patient eligibility and total dose, but has a different hypofractionation schedule (60 Gy in 15 fractions versus 60 Gy in 3 fractions). A common requirement of the BR25 and RTOG protocols is that the dose must be calculated by the TPS without tissue heterogeneity (TH) corrections. Our results show that optimizing plans using the pencil beam algorithm with no TH corrections does not ensure that the BR25 planning constraint of 99% of the PTV receiving at least 95% of the prescription dose would be achieved as revealed by MC simulations. This is due to poor modelling of backscatter and lateral electronic equilibrium by the TPS. MC simulations showed that as little as 75% of the PTV was actually covered by the 95% isodose line. The under-dosage of the PTV was even more pronounced if plans were optimized with the TH correction applied. In the most extreme case, only 23% of the PTV was covered by the 95% isodose.

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / radiotherapy*
  • Computer Simulation
  • Humans
  • Monte Carlo Method*
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Radiotherapy / methods*
  • Radiotherapy Dosage*
  • Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted / methods*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Scattering, Radiation