Randomized comparison of OASIS wound matrix versus moist wound dressing in the treatment of difficult-to-heal wounds of mixed arterial/venous etiology

Adv Skin Wound Care. 2010 Jan;23(1):34-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000363485.17224.26.

Abstract

Objective: In this study, a biological extracellular matrix was compared with a moist wound dressing to determine its effectiveness in the treatment of mixed arterial/venous and venous ulcers.

Methods: Patients were evaluated for complete wound healing, time to dressing change, and formation of granulation tissue.

Results: Extracellular matrix-treated ulcers achieved complete healing on average in 5.4 weeks as compared with 8.3 weeks for the control group treated with moist wound dressing (P = .02). At the primary time point evaluated (8 weeks), complete wound closure was achieved in 80% of extracellular matrix-treated ulcers compared with 65% of ulcers in the control group (P < .05). Statistically significant differences favoring the extracellular-matrix treatment group were also reported for time to dressing change (P < .05), and for percentage of granulation tissue formed (P < .05).

Conclusion: Overall, the biological extracellular matrix was more beneficial than moist wound dressings for the treatment of patients with mixed arterial/venous or venous ulcers.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Biological Dressings*
  • Extracellular Matrix
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Leg Ulcer / etiology
  • Leg Ulcer / therapy*
  • Male
  • Prospective Studies
  • Swine
  • Wound Healing*
  • Wounds and Injuries / etiology
  • Wounds and Injuries / therapy*