Intimate partner violence perpetration by court-ordered men: distinctions and intersections among physical violence, sexual violence, psychological abuse, and stalking

J Interpers Violence. 2011 Jan;26(2):230-53. doi: 10.1177/0886260510362896. Epub 2010 Apr 21.

Abstract

This study assessed the construct validity of two different measurement models of male partners' perpetration of physical violence, sexual violence, psychological abuse, and stalking against intimate partners. Data were obtained from a sample of 340 men arrested for physical assault of a female spouse or partner and court ordered into batterer intervention programs. Men were surveyed before starting the intervention. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to compare the construct validity of a four-factor measurement model of intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration to a three-factor measurement model that combined psychological abuse with stalking; overlap in the perpetration of the various forms of IPV was also examined. CFA results supported the superiority of a four-factor measurement model. There were 96.8% of participants who reported perpetration of all four types of violence; most men perpetrated multiple types of violence. Future studies should determine whether there are distinct risk factors associated with each of the four types of IPV perpetration.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Age Distribution
  • Criminals / psychology
  • Criminals / statistics & numerical data*
  • Factor Analysis, Statistical
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sex Offenses / psychology
  • Sex Offenses / statistics & numerical data*
  • Sexual Partners / psychology*
  • Spouse Abuse / psychology
  • Spouse Abuse / statistics & numerical data
  • Stalking / epidemiology*
  • Stalking / psychology
  • Stress, Psychological / epidemiology*
  • Stress, Psychological / psychology
  • Texas / epidemiology
  • Violence / psychology
  • Violence / statistics & numerical data*
  • Young Adult