A comparative study between continent diversion and bladder neck closure versus continent diversion and bladder neck reconstruction in children

J Pediatr Urol. 2011 Apr;7(2):209-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.03.011. Epub 2010 May 21.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the long-term outcome of continent diversion in children with structural or neurogenic cause of incontinence, with special interest in differences between closed and open bladder neck procedures.

Patients and methods: A cohort of 63 children with intractable incontinence treated with continent diversion between January 1998 and January 2008 were reviewed for underlying disease, type of surgery, complications and outcome.

Results: Forty patients had a continent diversion with open bladder neck (group 1) and 23 patients had their bladder neck closed (group 2: 11 primarily closed; 12 secondarily closed). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of patient characteristics, surgical re-interventions and stone formation. The continence rate however was significantly better in group 2 (95.6% vs 77.5%).

Conclusion: Bladder neck closure with continent diversion as primary or salvage procedure in children with intractable incontinence does not result in extra morbidity and has a high success rate. Thorough urodynamic evaluation of bladder function is the key to success in therapy planning for these children, to minimize the need for re-intervention.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Male
  • Plastic Surgery Procedures / methods*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Urinary Bladder / surgery*
  • Urinary Diversion / methods*
  • Urinary Incontinence / surgery*
  • Urinary Reservoirs, Continent*