Acceptability of offering financial incentives to achieve medication adherence in patients with severe mental illness: a focus group study

J Med Ethics. 2010 Aug;36(8):463-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.035071. Epub 2010 Jun 27.

Abstract

Background: Offering financial incentives to achieve medication adherence in patients with severe mental illness is controversial.

Aims: To explore the views of different stakeholders on the ethical acceptability of the practice.

Method: Focus group study consisting of 25 groups with different stakeholders.

Results: Eleven themes dominated the discussions and fell into four categories: (1) 'wider concerns', including the value of medication, source of funding, how patients would use the money, and a presumed government agenda behind the idea; (2) 'problems requiring clear policies', comprising of practicalities and assurance that incentives are only one part of a tool kit; (3) 'challenges for research and experience', including effectiveness, the possibility of perverse incentives, and impact on the therapeutic relationship; (4) 'inherent dilemmas' around fairness and potential coercion.

Conclusions: The use of financial incentives is likely to raise similar concerns in most stakeholders, only some of which can be addressed by empirical research and clear policies.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Antipsychotic Agents / economics
  • Antipsychotic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Female
  • Focus Groups
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Medication Adherence / psychology*
  • Mental Disorders / drug therapy*
  • Mental Disorders / economics
  • Middle Aged
  • Motivation*
  • Reward*
  • United Kingdom
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Antipsychotic Agents