Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography as compared to transient elastography and liver biopsy in patients with chronic hepatopathies

Ultraschall Med. 2011 Jan:32 Suppl 1:S46-52. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245360. Epub 2010 Jul 5.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare two methods of noninvasive assessment: transient elastography (TE) and acoustic radiation force impulse elastography (ARFI).

Patients and methods: Our study included 114 subjects: 38 healthy volunteers, (considered to have no fibrosis - F 0) and 76 patients with chronic liver disease: 53 who had undergone liver biopsy (LB) (7 with F 1, 24 with F 2, 22 with F 3 Metavir) and 23 previously diagnosed with cirrhosis (F4 Metavir). In each patient we performed a liver stiffness measurement by means of TE and ARFI. ARFI (shear wave velocity quantification) was performed at 3 points: at 0 - 1 cm, at 1 - 2 cm and at 2 - 3 cm under the capsule. For each depth, 5 valid measurements were made, and a median value was calculated, measured in m/sec.

Results: A direct, strong, linear correlation (Spearman rho = 0.848) was found between TE and the stage of fibrosis (p < 0.001). A significant, direct correlation was found between ARFI measurements made 1 - 2 cm and 2 - 3 cm below the liver capsule and the severity of fibrosis (rho = 0.675 and 0.714 respectively). The subcapsularly measured ARFI values showed a poor correlation with fibrosis (rho = 0.469). The best test for predicting significant fibrosis (F ≥ 2) was TE, with the area under receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.908, significantly larger than the AUROCs for ARFI. If only ARFI is considered, measurements made 1 - 2 and 2 - 3 cm below the capsule have the best predictive value, with AUROCs not significantly different from each other (0.767 and 0.731, respectively). For predicting fibrosis (F > 0), TE had the best predictive value: optimized cut-off 5.65 kPa (AUROC -0.898). For ARFI, the cut-offs were: 1.4 m/sec, AUROC -0.747 (1 - 2 cm), and 1.26 m/sec AUROC -0.721 (2 - 3 cm). For predicting cirrhosis (F = 4 Metavir), the optimized cut-offs were: TE -12.9 kPa (AUROC -0.994); ARFI - 1.78 m/sec for measurements made 2 - 3 cm below the capsule, AUROC - 0.951.

Conclusion: At present, liver elasticity evaluation by means of ARFI is not superior to TE for the assessment of liver fibrosis. For ARFI, the most reliable results are obtained if measurements are made 1 - 2 and 2 - 3 cm below the liver capsule. ARFI is an accurate test for the diagnosis of cirrhosis.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Biopsy
  • Elasticity Imaging Techniques / methods*
  • Female
  • Hepatitis B, Chronic / diagnostic imaging
  • Hepatitis B, Chronic / pathology
  • Hepatitis C, Chronic / diagnostic imaging
  • Hepatitis C, Chronic / pathology
  • Hepatitis, Alcoholic / diagnostic imaging
  • Hepatitis, Alcoholic / pathology
  • Hepatitis, Chronic / diagnostic imaging*
  • Hepatitis, Chronic / pathology
  • Humans
  • Liver / diagnostic imaging
  • Liver / pathology
  • Liver Cirrhosis / diagnostic imaging*
  • Liver Cirrhosis / pathology
  • Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary / diagnostic imaging
  • Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary / pathology
  • Liver Function Tests
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • ROC Curve
  • Reference Values