Applying evidence into routine clinical care at a unit level: the exemplar of renal anaemia management

Nephrology (Carlton). 2010 Jun;15(4):429-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2010.01300.x.

Abstract

Variability in implementing research evidence into clinical practice is widespread, including in the management of patients with kidney disease. There are numerous well-known barriers and facilitators to evidence implementation identified in other clinical settings and a few chronic kidney disease studies. The necessary changes to health systems that support evidence implementation take time to design, apply and to have a measurable effect. Measurement against an agreed standard is fundamental to this process. We use the example of renal anaemia management across a dialysis unit to illustrate an approach to these issues.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Anemia / blood
  • Anemia / complications
  • Anemia / drug therapy*
  • Biomarkers / blood
  • Critical Pathways* / organization & administration
  • Delivery of Health Care / organization & administration
  • Diffusion of Innovation
  • Evidence-Based Medicine*
  • Guideline Adherence
  • Hematinics / therapeutic use*
  • Hemoglobins / metabolism
  • Humans
  • Kidney Diseases / blood
  • Kidney Diseases / complications
  • Kidney Diseases / therapy*
  • Organizational Objectives
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Renal Dialysis*
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Biomarkers
  • Hematinics
  • Hemoglobins