Diagnosis of venous thromboembolism: an update

Vasc Med. 2010 Oct;15(5):399-406. doi: 10.1177/1358863X10378788.

Abstract

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) cannot be diagnosed solely on a clinical basis owing to the lack of sensitivity and specificity of clinical signs and symptoms. Phlebography and pulmonary angiography are invasive and resource-demanding imaging modalities. Because the prevalence of DVT and PE is relatively low (typically 20% or less) among clinically suspected individuals, submitting all of them to imaging would not be cost-effective. Therefore, non-invasive diagnostic algorithms have been developed that include clinical probability assessment and D-dimer measurement. These initial steps allow the selection of patients who require non-invasive imaging: compression ultrasonography in cases of suspected DVT and multidetector computed tomography (CT) angiography in cases of suspected PE. This review gives a critical appraisal of the sequential steps of the diagnostic work-up in suspected DVT or PE.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Age Factors
  • Algorithms
  • Biomarkers / blood
  • Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products / analysis
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Angiography
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prognosis
  • Pulmonary Embolism / diagnosis*
  • Pulmonary Embolism / therapy
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Ultrasonography
  • Venous Thromboembolism / diagnosis*
  • Venous Thromboembolism / therapy
  • Venous Thrombosis / diagnosis*
  • Venous Thrombosis / therapy

Substances

  • Biomarkers
  • Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products
  • fibrin fragment D