Identifying deafness in early childhood: requirements after the newborn hearing screen

Arch Dis Child. 2011 Jan;96(1):62-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.185819. Epub 2010 Nov 2.

Abstract

Background: Newborn hearing screening has been nationally implemented, but longitudinal cohort follow-up is required to inform Children's Hearing Services of the requirements for postneonatal care pathways.

Methods: A 10-year cohort of 35 668 births enrolled into a Universal Neonatal Hearing Screen was followed up until the children had completed the first year of primary school.

Results: There were 3.65/1000 children with a permanent hearing impairment of any degree embarking on their education. 1.51/1000 had a moderate or worse bilateral deafness but only 0.9/1000 with this degree of deafness had been identified by newborn screening. Postneonatal care pathways were required to identify those with congenital impairments missed by the screen (0.11/1000), those moving into the district (0.25/1000) and those with late onset deafness (0.25/1000). An additional postneonatal yield of 1.2/1000 had mild or unilateral impairments. When all degrees of impairment were considered 51% of the children with a permanent hearing impairment had required identification by postneonatal care pathways.

Conclusions: Despite the success of the newborn hearing screen, the provision of postneonatal pathways remains essential for identifying deafness in early childhood.

MeSH terms

  • Age Factors
  • Critical Pathways
  • Deafness / congenital
  • Deafness / diagnosis*
  • Deafness / epidemiology
  • Epidemiologic Methods
  • Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain Stem
  • False Negative Reactions
  • Female
  • Hearing Loss / diagnosis
  • Hearing Loss / epidemiology
  • Hearing Tests / methods
  • Humans
  • Infant, Newborn
  • London / epidemiology
  • Male
  • Neonatal Screening / standards*
  • Referral and Consultation