[Impact of positron emission tomography on clinical management of potentially resectable non-small-cell lung cancer: a French prospective multicenter study]

Rev Pneumol Clin. 2010 Oct;66(5):313-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pneumo.2010.07.015. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
[Article in French]

Abstract

Background: Whole-body (18)F-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has the potential to improve the management of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We prospectively evaluated the impact of combining FDG-PET with conventional staging methods, including computed tomography (CT), on the staging and management of patients with potentially resectable NSCLC.

Methods: Ninety-four consecutive patients with newly diagnosed/suspected NSCLC were enrolled. Each patient was first staged by using conventional methods, and then by FDG-PET. FDG-PET results were forwarded in a sealed envelope and divulged at the weekly staff meeting on staging and treatment, only after "Decision 1", based on conventional staging, had been reached by consensus; reevaluation taking FDG-PET into account yielded "Decision 2". The validity of these latter decisions was analyzed retrospectively.

Results: Eighty-nine patients were eligible. Relative to standard imaging, FDG-PET led to clinical staging changes in 26 (29.2%) patients. The stage was lowered in eight cases (9%) and raised in 18 cases (20.2%). "Decision 2" differed from "Decision 1" in 19 patients, modifying the surgical procedure in four cases, indicating other investigations to confirm FDG-PET evidence of metastases in 12 cases, or modifying the medical treatment in three cases. These modifications were retrospectively justified in 9/19 cases, and consisted of 2/4 modifications of the surgical procedure (one hilar and one adrenal metastasis not confirmed histologically), 4/12 further investigations (axillary and liver biopsies, mediastinoscopy, occult colon cancer) and three indications for palliative treatment, in patients who all died within 3 months after FDG-PET.

Conclusions: Based on FDG-PET, management was modified in 19/89 (21.3%) patients, but these changes were justified in only 9/89 patients (10.1%). FDG-PET can detect asymptomatic local and distant metastases and improves the preoperative assessment of NSCLC, thereby avoiding unnecessary surgery. However, histological verification is required because of the risk of false-positive results.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / diagnostic imaging
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / secondary
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / surgery*
  • Colonic Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging
  • Decision Making
  • False Positive Reactions
  • Female
  • Fluorodeoxyglucose F18*
  • Humans
  • Liver Neoplasms / secondary
  • Lung Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging
  • Lung Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Lymph Node Excision
  • Lymphatic Metastasis / diagnostic imaging
  • Male
  • Mediastinoscopy
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Neoplasms, Unknown Primary / diagnostic imaging
  • Palliative Care
  • Patient Care Planning
  • Pneumonectomy
  • Positron-Emission Tomography / methods*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Radiopharmaceuticals*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Whole Body Imaging

Substances

  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Fluorodeoxyglucose F18