Understanding contradictory data in contraction stress tests

J Dent Res. 2011 Mar;90(3):365-70. doi: 10.1177/0022034510388039. Epub 2010 Nov 22.

Abstract

The literature shows contradictory results regarding the role of composite shrinkage and elastic modulus as determinants of polymerization stress. The present study aimed at a better understanding of the test mechanics that could explain such divergences among studies. The hypothesis was that the effects of composite shrinkage and elastic modulus on stress depend upon the compliance of the testing system. A commonly used test apparatus was simulated by finite element analysis, with different compliance levels defined by the bonding substrate (steel, glass, composite, or acrylic). Composites with moduli between 1 and 12 GPa and shrinkage values between 0.5% and 6% were modeled. Shrinkage was simulated by thermal analogy. The hypothesis was confirmed. When shrinkage and modulus increased simultaneously, stress increased regardless of the substrate. However, if shrinkage and modulus were inversely related, their magnitudes and interaction with rod material determined the stress response.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Compliance
  • Composite Resins / chemistry*
  • Dental Stress Analysis / instrumentation
  • Dental Stress Analysis / methods*
  • Elastic Modulus
  • Finite Element Analysis
  • Materials Testing / instrumentation
  • Materials Testing / methods*
  • Stress, Mechanical
  • Transition Temperature

Substances

  • Composite Resins