Improving small-sample inference in group randomized trials with binary outcomes

Stat Med. 2011 Feb 10;30(3):201-10. doi: 10.1002/sim.4101. Epub 2010 Nov 5.

Abstract

Group Randomized Trials (GRTs) randomize groups of people to treatment or control arms instead of individually randomizing subjects. When each subject has a binary outcome, over-dispersed binomial data may result, quantified as an intra-cluster correlation (ICC). Typically, GRTs have a small number, bin, of independent clusters, each of which can be quite large. Treating the ICC as a nuisance parameter, inference for a treatment effect can be done using quasi-likelihood with a logistic link. A Wald statistic, which, under standard regularity conditions, has an asymptotic standard normal distribution, can be used to test for a marginal treatment effect. However, we have found in our setting that the Wald statistic may have a variance less than 1, resulting in a test size smaller than its nominal value. This problem is most apparent when marginal probabilities are close to 0 or 1, particularly when n is small and the ICC is not negligible. When the ICC is known, we develop a method for adjusting the estimated standard error appropriately such that the Wald statistic will approximately have a standard normal distribution. We also propose ways to handle non-nominal test sizes when the ICC is estimated. We demonstrate the utility of our methods through simulation results covering a variety of realistic settings for GRTs.

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms
  • Bias
  • Cluster Analysis
  • Computer Simulation
  • Humans
  • Logistic Models
  • Models, Statistical*
  • Probability
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / methods*
  • Sample Size
  • Statistical Distributions
  • Treatment Outcome