Measuring occupational balance: a theoretical exploration of two approaches

Can J Occup Ther. 2010 Dec;77(5):280-8. doi: 10.2182/cjot.2010.77.5.4.

Abstract

Background: Occupational balance is a fundamental yet complex concept in occupational therapy requiring empirical study.

Purpose: To advance the theoretical discussion of occupational balance, its measurement and relationship to well-being.

Methods: In part one of this 2-phase study, 122 adults completed a bipolar measure of occupational balance, the Cross Impact Matrix (CIM) of the Personal Project Analysis and two well-being measures: the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) and Positive and Negative Affect Scales (PANAS). In part two, 24 adults completed the Inter-goal Relations Questionnaire (IRQ), a unipolar measure of occupational balance (harmony) and imbalance (conflict), plus the SWLS and PANAS.

Findings: Neither the CIM scores nor IRQ occupational balance/harmony were associated with well-being whereas the IRQ occupational imbalance/conflict was significantly associated with SWLS.

Implications: Dimensions of occupational balance (conflict and harmony) may be best measured separately. To promote well-being attention can be given to reducing conflict across occupations.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adaptation, Psychological
  • Adult
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Occupational Health*
  • Occupational Therapy / psychology*
  • Personal Satisfaction
  • Surveys and Questionnaires*